DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE.  INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.

[STR New]

Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2243
Version: 1.3-current


...and yes, the patch is exactly what I described, thanks for converting my
report into something useful.

Regarding the bool/int issue, I have no objections - other than that bool
is of course more clear and perhaps more efficient, but it's probably more
important to be consistent with the rest of the code.

Regarding passing require_alt as a reference, that's just a habit I have
when coding C++. I realize it's more important with more expensive objects
performance-wise but I have just adopted that habit as a C++ standard way
of coding. It's of no real importance to me.

/Andreas


Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2243
Version: 1.3-current