| [ Return to Bugs & Features | Roadmap 2.0 | Post Text | Post File | SVN ⇄ GIT ]
STR #1610
Application: | FLTK Library |
Status: | 5 - New |
Priority: | 3 - Moderate, e.g. unable to compile the software |
Scope: | 2 - Specific to an operating system |
Subsystem: | Unassigned |
Summary: | ../fluid/fluid2: error while loading shared libraries: libfltk2_images.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
Version: | 2.0-current |
Created By: | Mark__T |
Assigned To: | Unassigned |
Fix Version: | Unassigned |
Update Notification: | |
Trouble Report Files:
[ Post File ]
Trouble Report Comments:
[ Post Text ]
|
#1 | Mark__T 06:51 Feb 21, 2007 |
| On my Linuxbox I get "Compiling progress.cxx... Linking progress... ../fluid/fluid2: error while loading shared libraries: libfltk2_images.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [radio.h] Error 127 make: *** [all] Error 2" during making of fltk. As mentioned by Antony ( http://fltk.org/articles.php?L699 ) it might only happen if fltk is not installed yet, otherwise it would probably link to the libs in /usr/lib/. | |
|
#2 | homerjay 07:01 Feb 23, 2007 |
| I also had this problem when I compiled fltk2 for the first time. I hadn't made the logical leap that it was because I didn't already have the libraries on my system. The following patch fixed it for me...
--- fltk-2.0.x-r5581/test/Makefile 2006-07-27 21:29:42.000000000 +0100 +++ fltk-2.0.x-r5581-mod/test/Makefile 2007-01-05 14:29:34.000000000 +0000 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ #
.fl.cxx .fl.h: - ../fluid/fluid2$(EXEEXT) -c $< + LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib:$(LD_LIBRARY_PATH) ../fluid/fluid2$(EXEEXT) -c $<
# | |
|
#3 | mike 04:46 Feb 24, 2007 |
| FWIW, we need to create both statically and dynamically linked versions of FLUID in 2.0, just as we do in 1.1.x. The dynamic version gets installed, the static version gets used at build-time. | |
|
#4 | bgbnbigben 07:30 Sep 30, 2010 |
| The attached patch should create both the dynamic and static versions of fluid correctly, as well as fix up a few linking issues (well, I wouldn't really call them issues - they just weren't in line with the 1.x branches) - and should also fix up the installation as mike suggested. Could someone please test this on their machine - it has been a while since I've last done anything with autoconf and makefiles! | |
[ Return to Bugs & Features | Post Text | Post File ]
|
| |